Management of failed cranioplasty


Sari R., Tonge M., Bolukbasi F. H., Onoz M., Baskan O., Silav G., ...Daha Fazla

Turkish Neurosurgery, cilt.27, sa.2, ss.201-207, 2017 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 27 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2017
  • Doi Numarası: 10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.15395-15.0
  • Dergi Adı: Turkish Neurosurgery
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.201-207
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Cast, Complication, Cranioplasty, Mold, Technique, Tissue expander
  • İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Aim: Failed cranioplasty attempts may lead to numerous complications in a broad spectrum including cosmetic problems, infection, neurological deterioration and even death. Selection of the most appropriate surgical technique for second and further surgical attempts for these patients still remains a debate. We aimed to share our experience and technical pitfalls on management of failed cranioplasty, particularly for patients with large cranial defects. Material and Methods: A retrospective data analysis of cranioplasty cases in our series was performed including the time period between 2002 and 2012. Patients required recurrent cranioplasty were analyzed in detail. Results: Totally, 101 patients underwent cranioplasty for bony defect. Of 101 patients, eleven required a revision surgery due to infection or spontaneous resorption of the bone flap. All patients underwent revision cranioplasty with pre-surgical plaster cast mold technique modified from previous studies and/or tissue expansion technique. Polymethyl-metacrylate (PMMA) was used as substitute for reconstructions. Mean follow-up was 36 months. Two out of eleven cases (18.1%) developed major complications, which led to further revision. At the end, a satisfactory reconstruction was achieved for all patients. Conclusion: Our modified molded plaster cast technique is a safe and cost-effective approach for the revision of failed cranioplasty. We believe that the tissue expanding techniques have also great contribution to achieve successful results.