The prognostic effect of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in locally advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: 18F-FDG PET/CT Metabolic Parameters in Esophageal Cancer


SAKİN A., Özçelik M., Sahin S., Aydemir O., Aldemir M. N., İliklerden Ü. H., ...Daha Fazla

Surgical Oncology, cilt.43, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 43
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101809
  • Dergi Adı: Surgical Oncology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Metabolic tumor volume, Tumor lesion glycolysis, Esophageal cancer, Chemoradiotherapy, Squamous cell carcinoma
  • İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to examine the relation between pre-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters [(including the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG)] and treatment response and survival in locally-advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer (ESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). Methods: A total 76 patients with locally-advanced ESCC who received dCRT between June 2015 and December 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups as complete response (CR) or non-complete response (Non-CR) according to response to treatment. AUC was obtained as 0.749 (p < 0.001) in the ROC curve drawn by MTV for the CR. The MTV value was ≤12 cm3, with 72.1% sensitivity and 73.0% specificity. Results: Of the 76 patients, 38 (50%) were male and 38 (50%) were female. The median age was 62 (39–84) years. The treatment response in 35 (46%) patients was CR. MTV value was >12cm3 in 41(54%) patients. Median follow-up time was 14.5 months. In patients with MTV>12cm3, median progression-free survival(mPFS) and median overall survival(mOS) were 9 months and 11 months, respectively, whereas mPFS and OS could not be reached in those with MTV≤12 cm3 (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). In patients with non-CR, mPFS and mOS were 8 months and 9 months, respectively, whereas mPFS and OS could not be reached in patients with CR (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.07), ECOG PS (OR, 11.1), and MTV (OR, 4.73) were found to be the factors affecting treatment response. Conclusion: In our study, treatment response and MTV were found to be the factors associated with survival in patients treated with dCRT, showing the pre-treatment MTV value as a predictor of treatment response.