Systematic review and meta-analysis of tocilizumab therapy versus standard of care in over 15,000 covid-19 pneumonia patients during the first eight months of the pandemic

Creative Commons License

Mahroum N., Watad A., Bridgewood C., Mansour M., Nasr A., Hussein A., ...More

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol.18, no.17, 2021 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Review
  • Volume: 18 Issue: 17
  • Publication Date: 2021
  • Doi Number: 10.3390/ijerph18179149
  • Journal Name: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Aqualine, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), CAB Abstracts, EMBASE, Food Science & Technology Abstracts, Geobase, MEDLINE, Pollution Abstracts, Veterinary Science Database, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Keywords: COVID-19, tocilizumab, systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Istanbul Medipol University Affiliated: Yes


Background. Tocilizumab is an anti-IL-6 therapy widely adopted in the management of the so-called “cytokine storm” related to SARS-CoV-2 virus infection, but its effectiveness, use in relation to concomitant corticosteroid therapy and safety were unproven despite widespread use in numerous studies, mostly open label at the start of the pandemic. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies utilising tocilizumab in COVID-19 on different databases (PubMed/MEDLINE/Scopus) and preprint servers (medRxiv and SSRN) from in-ception until 20 July 2020 (PROSPERO CRD42020195690). Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed. The impact of tocilizumab and concomitant corticosteroid therapy or tocilizumab alone versus standard of care (SOC) on the death rate, need for mechanical ventilation, ICU admission and bacterial infections were assessed. Results. Thirty-nine studies with 15,531 patients (3657 cases versus 11,874 controls) were identified. Unadjusted estimates (n = 28) failed to demonstrate a protective effect of tocilizumab on survival (OR 0.74 ([95%CI 0.55–1.01], p = 0.057), mechanical ventilation prevention (OR 2.21 [95%CI 0.53–9.23], p = 0.277) or prevention of ICU admission (OR 3.79 [95%CI 0.38–37.34], p = 0.254). Considering studies with adjusted, estimated, tocilizumab use was associated with mortality rate reduction (HR 0.50 ([95%CI 0.38–0.64], p < 0.001) and prevention of ICU admission (OR 0.16 ([95%CI 0.06–0.43], p < 0.001). Tocilizumab with concomitant steroid use versus SOC was protective with an OR of 0.49 ([95%CI 0.36–0.65], p < 0.05) as was tocilizumab alone versus SOC with an OR of 0.59 ([95%CI 0.34–1.00], p < 0.001). Risk of infection increased (2.36 [95%CI 1.001–5.54], p = 0.050; based on unadjusted estimates). Conclusion: Despite the heterogeneity of in-cluded studies and large number of preprint articles, our findings from the first eight of the pandemic in over 15,000 COVID-19 cases suggested an incremental efficacy of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 that were confirmed by subsequent meta-analyses of large randomized trials of tocili-zumab. This suggests that analysis of case-control studies and pre-print server data in the early stages of a pandemic appeared robust for supporting incremental benefits and lack of major therapeutic toxicity of tocilizumab for severe COVID-19.