Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups


OKTAY H., Ulukaya E.

European Journal of Orthodontics, cilt.32, sa.3, ss.307-312, 2010 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 32 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2010
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1093/ejo/cjp079
  • Dergi Adı: European Journal of Orthodontics
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.307-312
  • İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The aims of this study were to identify possible gender-related differences in tooth size ratios, to determine whether there is a prevalence for intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies in any malocclusion group, and to detect the percentage of tooth size discrepancies outside 1 or 2 standard deviations (SDs) from Bolton's mean. The material comprised the models of 500 subjects (284 females and 216 male aged between 12 and 28 years). Five groups were formed: normal occlusion, Class I, Class II division 1, Class II division 2, and Class III, which had an equal number of subjects. Tooth size measurements were undertaken using an electronic measuring device. Overall, anterior, and posterior ratios were computed as described by Bolton. For statistical evaluation, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) tests were used.A significant gender difference was found only for posterior ratio in all groups (P<0.01). There was no significant difference among the malocclusion groups in anterior ratio, but the differences for overall and posterior ratios were significant (P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively). A large number of subjects had discrepancies greater than 2 SD from Bolton's mean. In addition, the means and SDs in this investigation were found to be larger than those of Bolton. Intermaxillary tooth size ratios may vary in different malocclusion types and may, to some degree, contribute to the severity of a malocclusion. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved.